Primavera P6 consulting from planners who run it on live programmes.
Primavera P6 is the scheduling backbone of Australian major projects — and badly built P6 programmes are behind more disputes than most contracts. Nomad SPS provides P6 scheduling services from working planners: people who baseline, update, and defend P6 programmes on hyperscale data centres and major infrastructure every week, not trainers reading from a manual.
P6 scheduling services
We build P6 master programmes from a buildability-first plan: WBS and activity coding designed for reporting from day one, logic networks without the open ends and constraint abuse that fail audit, calendars and resources that reflect real site conditions, and baselines prepared to clear client scrutiny.
On live programmes we run the update cycle — progress capture, variance narratives, float and critical path management — and keep the programme an honest coordination tool rather than a monthly compliance upload.
P6 programme health checks
We audit existing P6 programmes against structured criteria — logic integrity, float manipulation, constraint abuse, resource realism, and DCMA 14-point-style checks — and report what a sophisticated client's auditor would find, before they find it.
P6 training that sticks
Our bespoke Primavera P6 training is built around your project environment, schedule standards, and data — not generic exercises. Teams leave able to run their own programmes under a method that survives contact with a real update cycle.
Common questions
Do you offer Primavera P6 training in Melbourne?
Yes — bespoke P6 training delivered in person in Melbourne or remotely Australia-wide, tailored to your project environment and schedule standards rather than generic coursework.
Can you rescue a P6 programme that has lost credibility?
Yes. A credibility rescue usually means re-validating logic, removing constraint and float manipulation, rebuilding the baseline position from evidence, and re-establishing an update rhythm the client can trust. We have done this under live operator scrutiny.
P6 or Microsoft Project — which should we use?
P6 for multi-contractor major programmes needing enterprise structure and audit-grade control; MS Project where the delivery environment is smaller or client-mandated. We work natively in both, and our Syncra platform reads both for comparison and health checks.